Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessments (RESEA) Library

To help practitioners find high-quality research to support RESEA program development and improvement, CLEAR has catalogued RESEA studies and assigned evidence ratings to indicate RESEA intervention effectiveness.

Here you can find which interventions have received high or moderate ratings, based on findings from rigorous causal impact studies. You can also delve into summaries of individual studies of interventions that you are interested in, to learn details such as the design of those interventions, the contexts where interventions were studied, the outcomes that were examined, and the sizes of impacts that were found. Those details can help you apply evidence to decisions regarding your own programs.

Intervention and Study Ratings

Findings from DOL's REA Impact Study

Findings from DOL's RESEA Implementation Study

Advanced Search

See search tips

Search Tips

  • Use Keywords: Enter specific terms related to your topic.

  • Filters: Apply filters like publication date, study type, and topic area to narrow results.

Need additional help searching for a study? You can reach out to us via Contact Us.

Results

1 - 10 of 32 results
Job Search Assistance Reemployment

Back to work: Testing reemployment services for displaced workers

Causal Evidence Rating:
Moderate Causal Evidence
Study Type:
Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Findings:
Earnings and wages: Mod/high-Favorable impacts
Employment: Mod/high-No impacts
Public benefits receipt: Mod/high-Favorable impacts
Intervention:
JSA services
Intervention Evidence Rating:
Moderate
Reemployment

Two essays on unemployment insurance: Claimant responses to policy changes [Contrast 1: Comparison between claimants who applied for UI benefits after WPRS only]

Causal Evidence Rating:
Low Causal Evidence
Study Type:
Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Findings:
Earnings and wages: Low-No impacts
Public benefits receipt: Low-Favorable impacts
Intervention:
Profiling
Intervention Evidence Rating:
Moderate
Reemployment

Two essays on unemployment insurance: Claimant responses to policy changes. [Comparison between claimants who applied for UI benefits before and after WPRS]

Causal Evidence Rating:
Low Causal Evidence
Study Type:
Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Findings:
Earnings and wages: Low-Favorable impacts
Public benefits receipt: Low-Favorable impacts
Intervention:
Profiling
Intervention Evidence Rating:
Moderate
Reemployment

The effects of eliminating the work search requirement on job match quality and other long-term employment outcomes.

Causal Evidence Rating:
High Causal Evidence
Study Type:
Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Findings:
Earnings and wages: Mod/high-No impacts
Employment: Mod/high-Unfavorable impacts
Public benefits receipt: Mod/high-Unfavorable impacts
Intervention:
Less stringent work search requirements
Intervention Evidence Rating:
No Rating
Reemployment

Effects of the unemployment insurance work test on long-term employment outcomes.

Causal Evidence Rating:
High Causal Evidence
Study Type:
Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Findings:
Earnings and wages: Mod/high-No impacts
Employment: Mod/high-Favorable impacts
Public benefits receipt: Mod/high-Favorable impacts
Intervention:
More stringent work search requirements
Intervention Evidence Rating:
Potentially Promising
Reemployment

Is the threat of reemployment services more effective than the services themselves? Evidence from random assignments in the UI system

Causal Evidence Rating:
High Causal Evidence
Study Type:
Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Findings:
Earnings and wages: Mod/high-Favorable impacts
Public benefits receipt: Mod/high-Favorable impacts
Intervention:
Profiling
Intervention Evidence Rating:
Moderate
Job Search Assistance Reemployment

Wisconsin Job Service: ERP Pilot Project final report

Causal Evidence Rating:
High Causal Evidence
Study Type:
Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Findings:
Public benefits receipt: Mod/high-No impacts
Intervention:
JSA services
Intervention Evidence Rating:
Moderate
Reemployment

Evaluation of Worker Profiling and Reemployment Services systems: Final Report.

Causal Evidence Rating:
Moderate Causal Evidence
Study Type:
Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Findings:
Earnings and wages: Mod/high-Favorable impacts
Employment: Mod/high-No impacts
Public benefits receipt: Mod/high-Favorable impacts
Intervention:
Profiling
Intervention Evidence Rating:
Moderate
Job Search Assistance Reemployment

The New Jersey Unemployment Insurance Reemployment Demonstration Project: Follow-up report

Causal Evidence Rating:
High Causal Evidence
Study Type:
Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Findings:
Earnings and wages: Mod/high-Favorable impacts
Employment: Mod/high-Favorable impacts
Public benefits receipt: Mod/high-Favorable impacts
Intervention:
JSA services
Intervention Evidence Rating:
Moderate
Reemployment

Impact of the Reemployment and Eligibility Assessment Initiative

Causal Evidence Rating:
High Causal Evidence
Study Type:
Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Findings:
Earnings and wages: Mod/high-Favorable impacts
Employment: Mod/high-Favorable impacts
Public benefits receipt: Mod/high-Favorable impacts
Intervention:
Reemployment Eligibility Assessment
Intervention Evidence Rating:
High